vivo Y75 5GvsZTE Blade A73

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

vivo
vivo Y75 5G
Y75 5G
Processor:MediaTek Dimensity 700 (MT6833)
RAM:8GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Vivo Y75 5G offers surprisingly good battery life with moderate usage, suitable for most users' needs.
The Vivo Y75 5G's display provides a reliable and effective visual experience with good brightness and color accuracy.
The Vivo Y75 5G's primary camera delivers crisp and vibrant images, despite some minor low-light issues.
The Vivo Y75 5G delivers seamless performance with efficient processor, ample RAM, and fast charging support overall smoothly.
ZTE
ZTE Blade A73
Blade A73
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T606
RAM:4GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Blade A73 boasts an impressive battery life with a massive 5000mAh power cell.
The ZTE Blade A73 boasts an impressive display with vibrant visuals, crisp text, and fluid motion at 90Hz refresh rate.
The ZTE Blade A73's camera is average, but sufficient for casual users with occasional photo needs.
The ZTE Blade A73's performance is generally satisfactory, suitable for everyday tasks and casual gaming requirements.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
vivo Y75 5G
2.20 GHz
ZTE Blade A73
1.60 GHz

RAM

Winner
vivo Y75 5G
8GB
ZTE Blade A73
4GB

Storage

Tie
vivo Y75 5G
128GB
ZTE Blade A73
128GB

Weight

Winner
vivo Y75 5G
187g
ZTE Blade A73
190g
Specifications Comparison
Specification
vivo vivo Y75 5G
ZTE ZTE Blade A73
Model
MediaTek Dimensity 700 (MT6833)
Unisoc Tiger T606
CPU
4x Cortex, A76 2.2 GHz + 4x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz
2x1.6 GHz Cortex, A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex, A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
7
12
Frequency
2.20
1.60
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Arm Mali-G57 MC2
ARM Mali-G57
RAM
8
4
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128
128
SD slot
No
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Gravity sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
N/A
N/A
Antutu Score
337200
210176
Antutu Version
Antutu v9
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 65% of devices
Overall performance better than 56% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

vivo Y75 5G

Strengths

No specific pros listed for this device

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

ZTE Blade A73

Strengths

The phone is priced reasonably affordable at Ringgit Malaysia 749, making it an attractive option for those looking for a budget-friendly 5G smartphone.
It has a 90Hz refresh rate and 6.52 HD Plus display, which should provide a smooth viewing experience.
The battery life is decent with a 5000 milliamp hour battery, which should last a day with moderate use.
The phone comes with 128 gigs of internal storage and can add another 4 gigs of virtual memory on top, making it suitable for everyday use.
It has a dual camera setup with a 13 megapixel primary sensor and a 2 megapixel depth sensor, which should take decent photos in well-lit conditions.
The phone's adaptive 5G feature allows users to prioritize certain applications to use 5G data, making it convenient for heavy internet users.

Weaknesses

The camera may not perform well in low-light conditions and may require a light source to take decent photos.
The phone's processor may struggle with demanding games like Mobile Legends, although Temple Run 2 runs smoothly.
There is no silicone case included with the box, which may be a drawback for some users.
The camera setup does not include a telephoto lens, which may limit its capabilities in terms of zoom and close-up shots.
The phone's battery life may not last as long if used extensively or with demanding applications.
Some compromises had to be made to keep the price affordable, which may affect the overall quality of the device.
Read Full Reviews

vivo Y75 5G

The Vivo Y75 5G is a mid-range smartphone that boasts impressive features such as dual-mode 5G, a 50MP primary camera, and a large 5000mAh battery with fast charging support. The phone's design is sleek and lightweight, weighing just 187 grams. * Dual-mode 5G connectivity * Triple-camera setup with 50MP primary sensor * Mediatek Dimensity 700 processor * 8GB RAM and 128GB storage * 6.58-inch LCD display * 5000mAh battery with fast charging support The phone's build quality is good, and the glass finish on the back provides a premium feel. The fingerprint scanner, located on the power button, is responsive and quick to unlock the device. Face unlock also works well in various lighting conditions. The camera interface is standard, with options for photo mode, super macro mode, and more. Sample shots show decent quality, but nothing exceptional. The phone runs Fun Touch OS 12 based on Android 12, which feels smooth and responsive. The storage is generous, offering about 107GB of usable space. The single speaker at the bottom produces satisfactory sound for ringtones, alarms, and media consumption. Overall, the Vivo Y75 5G offers a lot of value in its price range, making it a strong contender in the mid-range smartphone market.

ZTE Blade A73

The ZTE Blade A73 is an affordable smartphone that prioritizes functionality over luxury features. Priced at around RM749, this device aims to bridge the gap between budget-friendliness and high-end capabilities. Equipped with a 6.52-inch HD Plus display, a 5000mAh battery, and 128GB of internal storage, this phone promises to deliver on its core functions. With adaptive 5G technology and an Unisoc octa-core processor, the A73 is designed for users who want reliable performance without breaking the bank.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Read vivo Y75 5G ReviewRead ZTE Blade A73 Review

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features