We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Xiaomi 11T is a mid-ranger that packs high-level specs at an affordable price point. While sharing the same design as its Pro sibling, the vanilla model has some notable differences, including a lower-end chipset and slower charging speed. However, this may actually make it the better value proposition. One of the standout features of the 11T is its 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a fast 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth performance and excellent color accuracy. The phone's design is sleek and well-crafted, featuring a two-step camera bump and a curved glass back panel that reflects light. The 108MP main camera delivers excellent results, with rich detail and natural colors. The ultra-wide camera also performs well, producing sharp and detailed shots. However, the lack of HDR means that more challenging scenes may become blown out. Battery life is decent, with an endurance score of 98 hours in our tests. Charging speed is somewhat slower than its Pro sibling, reaching 86% charge in half an hour using the included 67W adapter. Overall, the Xiaomi 11T offers great value for a mid-ranger, competing with more expensive devices. Its powerful chipset, competitive cameras, and fast charging make it a compelling option, despite some minor compromises on features compared to its Pro sibling.
The Vivo X Fold+ is a exceptional foldable phone that boasts impressive hardware features. The device comes with two high-quality screens, one of which is an 8-inch main display, making it perfect for multitasking and productivity. The secondary screen can also be used as a cover display when the phone is folded, allowing users to stay informed without having to open the device. The camera system on the Vivo X Fold+ is also noteworthy, with a 50MP primary sensor and a 48MP ultra-wide-angle lens. However, it's worth noting that there is no electronic image stabilization for both selfie cameras, which can result in shaky footage. This issue can be mitigated by using the rear cameras as selfie shooters when the device is folded open. The battery life of the Vivo X Fold+ is a letdown, with an average on-screen time of around 5-5.5 hours. This is not surprising considering the foldable design and high-resolution screens. The phone's processor is efficient, but it still can't quite match the battery life of other flagships. Despite its excellent hardware features, the Vivo X Fold+ has some quirks in its software. Some apps are Chinese-specific and may not translate well to Western markets, while others have DPI issues that make them appear too large on the screen. Overall, however, the phone's strengths outweigh its weaknesses, making it a solid contender in the foldable market.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features