We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Metric | Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi K50 |
---|---|---|
Connectivity | #521 | #277 Winner |
Design | #9 Winner | #709 |
Display | #416 | #89 Winner |
Performance | #105 Winner | #306 |
Battery | #354 | #147 Winner |
Camera | #90 Winner | #519 |
item_phones_categoryId | #1 Tie | #1 Tie |
Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific cons listed for this device
The Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro is a mid-range smartphone that promises flagship features at a budget price. Priced affordably, this phone has a premium design with a 6.55-inch AMOLED display and a Leica-branded quad-camera setup on the back. The device comes in four colors - black, pink, blue, and green. The Civi 4 Pro boasts an impressive feature set, including a Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset, up to 16GB of LPDDR5x RAM, and up to 512GB of UFS 4.0 storage. The phone also has a liquid cooling system to prevent overheating and runs on Xiaomi's custom skin, MIUI. A Leica-branded triple camera setup at the back includes a 50MP main camera with a large sensor and f/1.6 aperture, a 50MP telephoto camera with 2x optical zoom, and a 12MP ultra-wide-angle camera. The phone has a dual-selfie camera system with two 32MP sensors, one of which is an ultrawide-angle camera. The Civi 4 Pro also features an in-display fingerprint scanner, face unlock, and IP68 water resistance. Battery life is decent with a 4700mAh battery that can last for a full day of moderate to heavy use. Fast charging is supported, but wireless charging or reverse wireless charging are not available. The Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro offers impressive value for its price, providing a great design, powerful performance, smooth software experience, and versatile camera system. While it lacks some features found in flagships, such as a headphone jack, microSD card slot, wireless charging, or reverse wireless charging, it is still an attractive option for those looking for a mid-range phone with flagship-like capabilities. For those who are not particular about having the latest and greatest technology, the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro may be a great choice. However, if one needs specific features that are not available on this device, other options should be considered.
I recently had the opportunity to try out the Xiaomi Redmi K50, and unfortunately, my experience was underwhelming. Despite its impressive specs on paper, this phone failed to deliver in several key areas. The camera performance was abysmal, especially in low-light conditions. The sensor size is decent, but it seems that the software is not optimized to extract the best from it. Daytime photos are okay, but nowhere near as good as what I've seen on other phones with similar cameras. The gaming experience was actually quite enjoyable, thanks to the phone's powerful processor and snappy performance. However, only a few games, like Asphalt 9, have adapted to take full advantage of the phone's high refresh rate capabilities. Battery life is decent for general use, but drops significantly when gaming or using resource-intensive apps. The display is nice, and the speakers are quite good, making it enjoyable to watch videos or listen to music on this phone. My biggest disappointment lies in the camera performance, which I believe is a software issue rather than a hardware one. For a phone priced around $500-$600, there are better options available that offer superior camera capabilities. If you're a gamer and don't mind a mediocre camera experience, then the Redmi K50 might be worth considering. However, if you prioritize taking good photos or have high expectations for your camera, I would suggest looking elsewhere. There are simply better phones on the market that offer more value for the price.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features