Xiaomi Mix 4vsOppo Reno11 F 5G

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Xiaomi
Xiaomi Mix 4
Mix 4
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+
RAM:8GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Xiaomi Mix 4's remarkable battery life is its standout feature, offering consistent two-day usage easily.
The Xiaomi Mix 4's exceptional display provides a smooth and immersive visual experience with vibrant colors.
The Xiaomi Mix 4's camera system has notable strengths, but falls short in low-light photography and zoom capabilities.
The Xiaomi Mix 4 delivers smooth performance but has notable thermal issues during intense gaming and high-end app usage.
Oppo
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
Reno11 F 5G
Processor:MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (MT6877)
RAM:8GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The Oppo Reno11 F 5G's battery life shines with quick charging and impressive endurance for demanding users.
The Oppo Reno11 F5G's display boasts stunning visuals with vivid colors, deep blacks, and a high refresh rate.
The main takeaway is that the Oppo Reno11 F 5G's camera performs decently but struggles in low-light conditions consistently.
The Oppo Reno11 F 5G delivers decent performance, suitable for daily tasks, but may stutter under heavy loads.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Xiaomi Mix 4
3 GHz
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
2.60 GHz

RAM

Tie
Xiaomi Mix 4
8GB
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
8GB

Storage

Winner
Xiaomi Mix 4
128GB
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
256GB

Weight

Winner
Xiaomi Mix 4
225g
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
177g
Rank
Xiaomi Mix 4
Winner
#260
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
#347
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Xiaomi Mix 4
#285
Winner
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
#305
Design
Xiaomi Mix 4
#493
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
#320
Winner
Display
Xiaomi Mix 4
#206
Winner
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
#403
Performance
Xiaomi Mix 4
#232
Winner
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
#423
Battery
Xiaomi Mix 4
#378
Winner
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
#405
Camera
Xiaomi Mix 4
#334
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
#295
Winner
item_phones_categoryId
Xiaomi Mix 4
#1
Tie
Oppo Reno11 F 5G
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Xiaomi Xiaomi Mix 4
Oppo Oppo Reno11 F 5G
Model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (MT6877)
CPU
1x Cortex X1 3.0GHz + 3x Cortex A78 2.42GHz + 4x Cortex A55 1.8GHz
2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex, A78+6x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex, A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
5
6
Frequency
3
2.60
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Adreno 660
Mali-G68 MC4
RAM
8
8
Type
RAM LPDDR5
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128
256
Type
UFS Storage 3.1
UFS Storage 3.1
SD slot
No
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, in screen
Yes, in screen
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
N/A
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
N/A
Gyroscope sensor
N/A
Yes
Gravity sensor
Yes
Yes
Hall sensor
Yes
Yes
LiDAR scanner
Yes
N/A
Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones
N/A
Antutu Score
884257
545000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 86% of devices
Overall performance better than 76% of devices
Cooling system
Yes
Yes
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
1206mm² Large surface 3D graphene board + 4932mm² Medium frame dual 40um graphene + 5150mm² dual 40um graphite, X-axis linear motor
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Xiaomi Mix 4

Strengths

Impressive Under Display Camera: The Xiaomi Mix 4 boasts the best under-display camera (UDC) technology currently available, surpassing even the Axon 30 Fold 3 and the first-generation Axon 20.
Fast Charging: The phone supports incredibly fast charging at 120 watts, taking around 22-25 minutes to fully charge the battery.
Great Ceramic Build: The Mix 4 has a fantastic ceramic build, with a solid construction that feels premium in hand. It's just a bit on the heavier side, weighing over 220 grams.
Fast Wireless Charging: Despite not having the wireless charger on hand, the phone's wireless charging speed is around 30 minutes.

Weaknesses

Outdated Camera Sensor: The Mix 4's camera choice of a 108-megapixel HMX sensor from Samsung feels like a missed opportunity, especially considering it's slightly dated for late 2021. A GN2 camera would have been a more desirable upgrade.
Thermal Issues with Snapdragon 8+ Plus: Unfortunately, the phone's performance is hampered by thermal issues associated with the Snapdragon 8+ Plus chipset. This can lead to overheating and even booting out of demanding games or apps.

Oppo Reno11 F 5G

Strengths

Its design is one of its good things, it sports a mat-like texture with a glossy finish on its back, a compact build, thin, rounded edges, and weighs only 177g
The display is impressive, flat, big, with vibrant and sharp colors, deep blacks, and a high Peck brightness that makes using the device outdoors not a problem
The camera takes some solid quality images especially in daylight, outputs have sharp details, vibrant colors, wide dynamic range, good and balanced exposures
Battery life is decent, can last the whole day for casual users, and up to 7 hours for heavy users during our video Loop test
It's a premium-looking device with decent performance, good battery life, and comes at a reasonable price tag of 18,999 pesos

Weaknesses

The triple camera setup feels like gimmicks, especially the 2MP macro sensor which could have been a dual camera setup with a higher megapixel Ultra wide
Performance can stutter slightly when on heavy load, and it may not be the best choice for graphically demanding games
The battery life depends on usage patterns, and may not last as long for heavy users
Charging time is relatively long, taking 57 minutes to go from 0 to 100%
The AI eraser feature in the gallery can sometimes produce smudges on images when removing unwanted items
Read Full Reviews

Xiaomi Mix 4

The Xiaomi Mi 11 is a phone that has left me with mixed feelings. On the one hand, it boasts some impressive specs, including a 108MP Samsung HMX sensor and a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Plus chip. The phone's ceramic build and fast charging capabilities (120W) are also notable features. However, my experience with the camera was underwhelming. While the 108MP sensor is capable of producing high-quality images, it feels like an outdated choice in today's market. I would have preferred a GN2 sensor, which is used in the Mi 11 Ultra. The camera's performance is further compromised by its tendency to switch between digital and optical zoom modes. The Snapdragon 8+ Plus chip is another area of concern. While it delivers excellent performance, it also suffers from overheating issues when subjected to demanding tasks like gaming or benchmarking. This was evident in my experience with the Antutu benchmark test, which crashed due to excessive heat. Despite these drawbacks, the Mi 11 still has some redeeming qualities. The phone's ceramic build is solid and premium-feeling, and the fast charging capabilities are a welcome feature. However, the camera and thermal issues make it difficult for me to wholeheartedly recommend this phone. Overall, the Xiaomi Mi 11 is a phone with potential that falls short due to its mixed performance. While it may appeal to those seeking a fast-charging experience, I would caution gamers and photographers to look elsewhere.

Oppo Reno11 F 5G

The Oppo Reno 11 F 5G is a mid-range device that offers impressive features at an affordable price. With its sleek design and premium look, this smartphone boasts a 6.7-inch full HD Plus OLED display, paired with a 120 Hz refresh rate and 1,100 nits of peak brightness. The triple camera setup, including a 64 MP main sensor and 32 MP selfie shooter, is another notable feature. Powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 750 chip, this device provides decent performance for daily tasks, making it an attractive option for those seeking value without breaking the bank.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Read Xiaomi Mix 4 ReviewRead Oppo Reno11 F 5G Review

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features