We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Xiaomi Redmi 13 is an affordable entry-level device that offers a glass build with IP53 rating and a high-res main camera, making it a decent option for those on a tight budget. However, this phone has several downsides that make it hard to recommend. Firstly, the screen doesn't get very bright, peaking at around 340 nits, which is disappointing considering the trend of more vibrant displays in recent smartphones. The single speaker produces average sound quality with muddy mids and distortion at high volumes. The battery life is also nothing special, lasting around 10 hours and 28 minutes during active use. The biggest shortcoming of the Redmi 13, however, is its performance. Despite using a relatively new Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra chipset, this phone falls behind in benchmark scores and even budget competitors from last year. The stuttering and lag are constant issues, making it hard to live with. The camera department is somewhat redeeming, with the 108MP main camera producing decent photos during the day, although pixel bending results in a lower effective resolution of 12MP. Low-light performance is average, but daytime shots are solid for a budget device. The selfie camera delivers surprisingly clean and detailed images. Given its shortcomings, particularly the poor performance, it's hard to recommend the Xiaomi Redmi 13 even as a budget option. If you're looking for an alternative, consider devices like the Samsung Galaxy A25 or Poco M6 Pro.
The Vivo iQOO Z3 is a budget smartphone that boasts impressive specs at an affordable price point. The device features a 6.58-inch LCD display, which may be a letdown for those accustomed to AMOLED displays. However, the display is still decent and gets quite bright. Powering the phone is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G processor, which should provide smooth performance for most users. Gaming is also a highlight, with a 120Hz refresh rate that ensures seamless visuals. The camera setup is identical to many other budget phones on the market, featuring a 64MP primary sensor and a range of modes, including portrait, beauty, and video stabilizer. While it takes good pictures and videos, there's nothing particularly standout about the camera. One notable feature is the presence of a headphone jack, which has become increasingly rare in recent smartphones. The battery life is also satisfactory, with moderate use easily lasting a full day. In terms of value for money, the iQOO Z3 is a decent option, but it doesn't necessarily offer anything revolutionary. Other budget phones on the market may provide similar specs at competitive prices. While not outstanding, the Vivo iQOO Z3 should still appeal to those seeking an affordable smartphone with good performance and camera quality. Ultimately, whether or not to purchase the iQOO Z3 depends on individual preferences and needs. For those who value a seamless gaming experience, the phone may be worth considering. However, those expecting cutting-edge camera capabilities or AMOLED display may want to look elsewhere. Overall, the Vivo iQOO Z3 is an average smartphone that gets the job done without impressing.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features