We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Xiaomi Redmi 13 is an affordable entry-level device that offers a glass build with IP53 rating and a high-res main camera, making it a decent option for those on a tight budget. However, this phone has several downsides that make it hard to recommend. Firstly, the screen doesn't get very bright, peaking at around 340 nits, which is disappointing considering the trend of more vibrant displays in recent smartphones. The single speaker produces average sound quality with muddy mids and distortion at high volumes. The battery life is also nothing special, lasting around 10 hours and 28 minutes during active use. The biggest shortcoming of the Redmi 13, however, is its performance. Despite using a relatively new Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra chipset, this phone falls behind in benchmark scores and even budget competitors from last year. The stuttering and lag are constant issues, making it hard to live with. The camera department is somewhat redeeming, with the 108MP main camera producing decent photos during the day, although pixel bending results in a lower effective resolution of 12MP. Low-light performance is average, but daytime shots are solid for a budget device. The selfie camera delivers surprisingly clean and detailed images. Given its shortcomings, particularly the poor performance, it's hard to recommend the Xiaomi Redmi 13 even as a budget option. If you're looking for an alternative, consider devices like the Samsung Galaxy A25 or Poco M6 Pro.
The Vivo Y300 Pro stands out with its massive 6,500mAh battery, making it an attractive option for those seeking long-lasting power without added bulk. Despite its large capacity, the phone's thickness and weight are comparable to regular flagship devices, thanks to Vivo's innovative battery packaging and reduced motherboard size. In our testing, the phone performed exceptionally well, lasting 5 hours in a heavy endurance test with minimal battery drop. Video watching consumed just 4% of the battery, allowing for up to 20 hours of continuous playback. Gaming performance was also impressive, with Honor of Kings playable at 90 FPS for up to 11 hours. The Vivo Y300 Pro supports fast charging, reaching 100% in just 48 minutes. Its battery can be charged up to 1,700 times and still retain over 80% capacity. The phone's design is sleek, with a 6.7-inch OLED display featuring rounded corners and a slight curve for comfortable handling. The Y300 Pro also boasts an IR remote control and IP65 waterproof rating, making it practical for everyday use. With up to 12GB of RAM and 512GB storage, the phone performs well in daily tasks and can handle demanding games like Honor of Kings at 90 FPS. However, camera quality is below average, with no optical image stabilization. The Vivo Y300 Pro starts at CNY 799 (around $253 USD) for its base variant with 8GB RAM and 128GB storage. This phone is ideal for those prioritizing battery life, multimedia use, and casual gaming. While it may have some drawbacks, the Y300 Pro's impressive battery performance makes it a compelling option for those seeking a long-lasting device without added bulk.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features