We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
Despite its impressive specs on paper, the Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro failed to deliver in various aspects. The phone's camera was a major letdown, struggling with low-light photography and often overexposing images. Even using a GCAM port didn't improve the results significantly. Daytime photos were excellent, but that's not enough to redeem the camera's shortcomings. The 100-megapixel sensor, touted as a highlight of the phone, seemed to be hampered by software issues rather than hardware limitations. The battery life was average, with around 7-8 hours of screen time in everyday use. However, gaming performance was excellent, with smooth gameplay and long battery life (4-5 hours). The speakers were also impressive, making this a great phone for gaming enthusiasts. However, the camera's poor performance makes it hard to recommend this phone, especially when considering its high price point. For the same money, you can get better cameras on older Xiaomi phones or even last year's OnePlus 9 Pro. If your primary concern is gaming, then the Redmi K50 Pro might be a good choice. The display, battery life, and speakers all performed well in this regard. However, if photography is important to you, there are far better options available, making this phone a hard sell overall.
The Vivo X100 Ultra is a top-tier camera phone in Vivo's X series, boasting impressive specs but limited availability in China. Despite this, the phone's camera capabilities are worth examining. The device features a 50MP main cam with a 1-in type Lita sensor, a 200MP 3.7x telephoto cam, and a 50MP ultrawide camera. In daylight photos, the main cam produces excellent detail rendition, crisp images, and wide dynamic range. Low-light performance is also commendable, with great detail and expressive shadows. The main cam can shoot videos in up to 8K resolution, but 4K makes more sense for practical use. Videos are detailed and have a natural color balance. The telephoto camera excels at 3.7x zoom, capturing sharp and noise-free photos with excellent dynamic range and color reproduction. It's particularly strong at night, delivering solid results even in dark scenes. The ultrawide cam performs well, with excellent dynamic range and likable colors, although it lags behind the X100 Pro model. Selfies from the X100 Ultra are also commendable, with lifelike skin tones and vibrant colors. Overall, the Vivo X100 Ultra has top-class camera hardware, with a great main camera and an exceptional telephoto cam. While its performance is good but not class-leading, it's still a strong contender in the flagship market. If you're looking for a similar experience without the hassle of importing from China, the globally available Vivo X100 Pro might be a more practical option. However, if you can overlook the limited availability and prefer a slightly different camera setup, the Vivo X100 Ultra is worth considering.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features