Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4GvsZTE Blade A73

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Xiaomi
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
Processor:MediaTek Helio G96
RAM:6GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G offers reliable battery backup and fast charging speeds with ease.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G's display is a mixed bag, lacking HDR support and decent gaming performance.
The primary issue with the Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G's camera is excessive over-sharpening and poor noise handling overall.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G's performance is underwhelming and falls short of expectations at its Rs 20,000 price point.
ZTE
ZTE Blade A73
Blade A73
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T606
RAM:4GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Blade A73 boasts an impressive battery life with a massive 5000mAh power cell.
The ZTE Blade A73 boasts an impressive display with vibrant visuals, crisp text, and fluid motion at 90Hz refresh rate.
The ZTE Blade A73's camera is average, but sufficient for casual users with occasional photo needs.
The ZTE Blade A73's performance is generally satisfactory, suitable for everyday tasks and casual gaming requirements.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
2.05 GHz
ZTE Blade A73
1.60 GHz

RAM

Winner
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
6GB
ZTE Blade A73
4GB

Storage

Winner
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
64GB
ZTE Blade A73
128GB

Weight

Winner
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
202g
ZTE Blade A73
190g
Rank
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
Winner
#449
ZTE Blade A73
#786
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
#654
Winner
ZTE Blade A73
#717
Design
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
#712
Winner
ZTE Blade A73
#742
Display
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
#199
Winner
ZTE Blade A73
#700
Performance
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
#578
Winner
ZTE Blade A73
#812
Battery
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
#604
Winner
ZTE Blade A73
#727
Camera
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
#78
Winner
ZTE Blade A73
#830
item_phones_categoryId
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
#1
Tie
ZTE Blade A73
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Xiaomi Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G
ZTE ZTE Blade A73
Model
MediaTek Helio G96
Unisoc Tiger T606
CPU
2x Cortex, A76 2.05 GHz + 6x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz
2x1.6 GHz Cortex, A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex, A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12
12
Frequency
2.05
1.60
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
ARM Mali-G57 MC2 900MHz
ARM Mali-G57
RAM
6
4
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
64
128
Type
UFS Storage 2.2
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
N/A
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones
N/A
Antutu Score
340000
210176
Antutu Version
Antutu v9
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 65% of devices
Overall performance better than 56% of devices
Cooling system
Yes
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G

Strengths

The device has a good display with vibrant colors, and you can easily use it outdoors
It has a stereo sound setup that is pretty good and quite crisp
You get a fast charging speed of 67 watts, which takes about 48 minutes to go from zero to 100%
The battery life is good, providing easy 1.5 days of backup
The device's day-to-day performance is good, making it suitable for general use
It's still a good buy compared to the competition and other devices in the market

Weaknesses

The display is downgraded without HDR support
The cameras are missing a 5MP sensor, which was present in the predecessor Redmi Note 10 Pro
The processing power is not as good as it was on the Redmi Note 10 Pro or Pro Max
The device uses an outdated 12nm processor (Helio G96), which is not suitable for a phone priced at Rs. 20,000
It cannot record videos in 60fps, which is disappointing considering its price point
The device heats up slightly during usage

ZTE Blade A73

Strengths

The phone is priced reasonably affordable at Ringgit Malaysia 749, making it an attractive option for those looking for a budget-friendly 5G smartphone.
It has a 90Hz refresh rate and 6.52 HD Plus display, which should provide a smooth viewing experience.
The battery life is decent with a 5000 milliamp hour battery, which should last a day with moderate use.
The phone comes with 128 gigs of internal storage and can add another 4 gigs of virtual memory on top, making it suitable for everyday use.
It has a dual camera setup with a 13 megapixel primary sensor and a 2 megapixel depth sensor, which should take decent photos in well-lit conditions.
The phone's adaptive 5G feature allows users to prioritize certain applications to use 5G data, making it convenient for heavy internet users.

Weaknesses

The camera may not perform well in low-light conditions and may require a light source to take decent photos.
The phone's processor may struggle with demanding games like Mobile Legends, although Temple Run 2 runs smoothly.
There is no silicone case included with the box, which may be a drawback for some users.
The camera setup does not include a telephoto lens, which may limit its capabilities in terms of zoom and close-up shots.
The phone's battery life may not last as long if used extensively or with demanding applications.
Some compromises had to be made to keep the price affordable, which may affect the overall quality of the device.
Read Full Reviews

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 4G is a device that has sparked two major questions: whether it's a worthy successor to the legendary Redmi Note 10 Pro or Pro Max, and if the 4G variant offers more value for money compared to its 5G counterpart, the Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus. Design-wise, the Note 11 Pro 4G boasts a flat-edge design that may appeal to fans of this style, but personally, I prefer curves as they add grip to the device. The build quality is good, with glass on both front and back, and IP53 rating. However, the display is downgraded compared to its predecessor, lacking HDR support. The camera performance is also underwhelming, missing a 5MP sensor present in the Note 10 Pro series. Videos cannot be recorded in 4K resolution or even at 60fps, which is disappointing considering the device's price point. In terms of performance, the device runs on MIUI 13 based on Android 11, which is outdated for a phone priced at Rs. 20,000. The Helio G96 processor feels like a step down from the Snapdragon 732G, and while it handles day-to-day tasks well, it's not impressive in terms of gaming performance or battery life. The battery, however, is a highlight with a 5000mAh capacity and fast charging capabilities. The pricing starts at Rs. 18,000 for the base variant, but it's often out of stock. Considering its downsides, I wouldn't consider this device as a proper successor to the Note 10 Pro series. Xiaomi's decision to use an outdated Helio G96 processor in a phone priced at Rs. 20,000 may be understandable given chipset manufacturers' shift towards 5G processors. However, it still doesn't make this device a standout in its price segment.

ZTE Blade A73

The ZTE Blade A73 is an affordable smartphone that prioritizes functionality over luxury features. Priced at around RM749, this device aims to bridge the gap between budget-friendliness and high-end capabilities. Equipped with a 6.52-inch HD Plus display, a 5000mAh battery, and 128GB of internal storage, this phone promises to deliver on its core functions. With adaptive 5G technology and an Unisoc octa-core processor, the A73 is designed for users who want reliable performance without breaking the bank.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features