ZTE Axon 50 LitevsZTE Axon 60 Lite

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

ZTE
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
Axon 50 Lite
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T618
RAM:4GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Axon 50 Lite's average battery life holds it back despite its other notable features being sufficient.
The ZTE Axon 50 Lite's display is serviceable, but lacks vibrancy and accuracy for a premium viewing experience.
The ZTE Axon 50 Lite's camera delivers impressive results with good image quality, low-light performance, and 4K video recording capabilities.
The ZTE Axon 50 Lite delivers commendable performance for its price range, suitable for everyday tasks and gaming.
ZTE
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
Axon 60 Lite
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T606
RAM:4GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Axon 60 Lite's battery life is a mixed bag, with moderate use lasting around 12-14 hours.
The display on the ZTE Axon 60 Lite is decent but not particularly impressive or noteworthy overall.
The ZTE Axon 60 Lite's camera is an average performer, suitable for basic use but lacking in advanced features and low-light quality.
The ZTE Axon 60 Lite's average performance is a notable drawback, limiting its capabilities significantly.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
2 GHz
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
1.60 GHz

RAM

Tie
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
4GB
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
4GB

Storage

Tie
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
256GB
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
256GB

Weight

Winner
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
182g
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
190g
Rank
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
Winner
#753
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
#785
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#657
Winner
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
#814
Design
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#744
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
#741
Winner
Display
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#748
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
#699
Winner
Performance
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#748
Winner
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
#803
Battery
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#728
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
#726
Winner
Camera
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#791
Winner
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
#829
item_phones_categoryId
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
#1

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
ZTE ZTE Axon 50 Lite
ZTE ZTE Axon 60 Lite
Model
Unisoc Tiger T618
Unisoc Tiger T606
CPU
6 x ARM Cortex, A55 1.8Ghz + 2 x ARM Cortex, A75 2.0Ghz
2x1.6 GHz Cortex, A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex, A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12
12
Frequency
2
1.60
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
GPU ARM Mali-G52-MP2
ARM Mali-G57
RAM
4
4
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
256
256
SD slot
No
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Audio
N/A
DTS / DTS X
Antutu Score
224000
240000
Antutu Version
Antutu v9
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 57% of devices
Overall performance better than 59% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

ZTE Axon 50 Lite

Strengths

The device maintains good gaming performance without too spectacular graphics.
It will give you a very good playability although it will not give you the ability to record game plays because recording the screen considerably decreases its performance in Legends and Call of Duty.
The storage capacity is 256 GB, which is spectacular for this price range.
The Mali g57 mp2 GPU can smoothly resolve various content, although not with such Advanced graphical effects.

Weaknesses

It does not support various graphical effects previously uniso processors integrated a very bad GPU power VR.
The battery life was not mentioned, but the device has some limitations that may affect performance and storage capacity.
Recording the screen decreases its performance, especially in games like Call of Duty.
The temperature exceeded 40° C during gaming, which may be a concern for some users.

ZTE Axon 60 Lite

Strengths

The storage capacity is one of its strongest points with 256 GB, a significant upgrade from the usual 128 or 64 GB in other cases.
It has a good camera that can record video with no complaints and can take decent photos.
The device shows us that it does not have too much power to export video but it still works fine.
It's pretty good for gameplay without screen recording, especially on low graphic quality settings.
The game ran well without special problems, even with multiple apps open at the same time.
The screen is responsive and has a good touch speed, although slightly slow compared to other devices.
Exporting full HD video was possible in 48 seconds, indicating decent storage performance.

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Read Full Reviews

ZTE Axon 50 Lite

The ZTE Axon 50 Lite is a budget-friendly smartphone that aims to deliver a smooth user experience despite its low-end price tag. With its powerful Mali-G57 MP2 GPU and generous 256GB storage, this device promises to handle demanding tasks such as gaming and video editing with ease. But how does it really perform? Can it keep up with the demands of modern users? This review will take a closer look at the Axon 50 Lite's capabilities, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide if it's worth considering for your next smartphone purchase.

ZTE Axon 60 Lite

The ZTE Axon 60 Lite is a budget-friendly smartphone that delivers what you'd expect from a low-cost device. With its strongest point being storage capacity, boasting an impressive 256GB, it's perfect for those who need to store lots of media. However, performance-wise, it's a different story, with a simple processor and only 4GB of RAM making it struggle to keep up with demanding tasks. In this review, we'll put the Axon 60 Lite through its paces and see how it stacks up against other devices in its price range.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features