ZTE Axon 50 LitevsZTE Blade A75 5G

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

ZTE
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
Axon 50 Lite
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T618
RAM:4GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Axon 50 Lite's average battery life holds it back despite its other notable features being sufficient.
The ZTE Axon 50 Lite's display is serviceable, but lacks vibrancy and accuracy for a premium viewing experience.
The ZTE Axon 50 Lite's camera delivers impressive results with good image quality, low-light performance, and 4K video recording capabilities.
The ZTE Axon 50 Lite delivers commendable performance for its price range, suitable for everyday tasks and gaming.
ZTE
ZTE Blade A75 5G
Blade A75 5G
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T760
RAM:4GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Blade A75 5G's impressive battery life is its standout feature and major selling point overall.
The display is decent but average, suitable for general use, not ideal for gaming or video watching.
The ZTE Blade A75 5G's camera excels in color reproduction and portrait mode, but struggles with low-light photography.
The ZTE Blade A75 5G's performance falls short of expectations, particularly with demanding tasks and gaming applications.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
2 GHz
ZTE Blade A75 5G
2.20 GHz

RAM

Tie
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
4GB
ZTE Blade A75 5G
4GB

Storage

Winner
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
256GB
ZTE Blade A75 5G
128GB

Weight

Winner
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
182g
ZTE Blade A75 5G
204g
Rank
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#753
ZTE Blade A75 5G
Winner
#639
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#657
ZTE Blade A75 5G
#379
Winner
Design
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#744
ZTE Blade A75 5G
#738
Winner
Display
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#748
ZTE Blade A75 5G
#439
Winner
Performance
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#748
ZTE Blade A75 5G
#553
Winner
Battery
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#728
ZTE Blade A75 5G
#680
Winner
Camera
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#791
ZTE Blade A75 5G
#786
Winner
item_phones_categoryId
ZTE Axon 50 Lite
#
ZTE Blade A75 5G
#1

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
ZTE ZTE Axon 50 Lite
ZTE ZTE Blade A75 5G
Model
Unisoc Tiger T618
Unisoc Tiger T760
CPU
6 x ARM Cortex, A55 1.8Ghz + 2 x ARM Cortex, A75 2.0Ghz
4x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex, A76 +4x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex, A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12
6
Frequency
2
2.20
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
GPU ARM Mali-G52-MP2
ARM Mali-G57 MP4
RAM
4
4
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
N/A
Capacity
256
128
Type
N/A
UFS Storage 3.1
SD slot
No
No
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, in screen
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
N/A
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
N/A
N/A
Antutu Score
224000
423297
Antutu Version
Antutu v9
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 57% of devices
Overall performance better than 71% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

ZTE Axon 50 Lite

Strengths

The device maintains good gaming performance without too spectacular graphics.
It will give you a very good playability although it will not give you the ability to record game plays because recording the screen considerably decreases its performance in Legends and Call of Duty.
The storage capacity is 256 GB, which is spectacular for this price range.
The Mali g57 mp2 GPU can smoothly resolve various content, although not with such Advanced graphical effects.

Weaknesses

It does not support various graphical effects previously uniso processors integrated a very bad GPU power VR.
The battery life was not mentioned, but the device has some limitations that may affect performance and storage capacity.
Recording the screen decreases its performance, especially in games like Call of Duty.
The temperature exceeded 40° C during gaming, which may be a concern for some users.

ZTE Blade A75 5G

Strengths

The phone has a plastic frame and glossy back panel that makes it feel not under the entry-level segment.
The IPS LCD screen with a refresh rate of 120 Hz produces vivid colors for a decent viewing experience.
The phone comes with a transparent rubber case out of the box to address smudges on the back panel.
The device has a dual rear camera setup that can shoot up to 4K at 30 FPS and has an 8MP selfie shooter.

Weaknesses

The phone's build quality is prone to smudges due to its glossy back panel.
The audio from the speaker feels muffled, especially during calls.
The device heats up significantly during gaming sessions, making it uncomfortable to hold.
The charging speed is slow, taking almost 3 hours to charge from 20% to full.
Read Full Reviews

ZTE Axon 50 Lite

The ZTE Axon 50 Lite is a budget-friendly smartphone that aims to deliver a smooth user experience despite its low-end price tag. With its powerful Mali-G57 MP2 GPU and generous 256GB storage, this device promises to handle demanding tasks such as gaming and video editing with ease. But how does it really perform? Can it keep up with the demands of modern users? This review will take a closer look at the Axon 50 Lite's capabilities, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide if it's worth considering for your next smartphone purchase.

ZTE Blade A75 5G

The ZTE Blade A75 5G is an affordable smartphone that stands out in the entry-level segment with its price alone. While most devices settle for basic 4G connectivity and Wi-Fi, this phone boasts a 5G enabled experience. With a sleek design, HD+ display, and quad-camera setup, it's clear that ZTE aimed to deliver a solid mid-range device. But does it live up to expectations? We'll dive into the details of its performance, camera quality, and gaming capabilities to see if this phone is worth considering for those on a budget.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features