ZTE Axon 60vsvivo Y29 5G

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

ZTE
ZTE Axon 60
Axon 60
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T616
RAM:6GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Axon 60's poor battery life makes it difficult to recommend due to disappointing longevity.
The ZTE Axon 60's display is decent but doesn't particularly stand out, lacking a wow factor overall.
The ZTE Axon 60's camera is a major disappointment due to poor low-light performance and lackluster image quality consistently.
The ZTE Axon 60's surprisingly good performance makes it a great value for money, especially for content creators.
vivo
vivo Y29 5G
Y29 5G
Processor:MediaTek Dimensity 6300
RAM:4GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Vivo Y29 5G has an average battery life despite its large 6,000mAh power capacity.
The Vivo Y29 5G's display is average, lacking color accuracy and vibrancy compared to similar priced offerings elsewhere.
The Vivo Y29 5G's camera is a major letdown with subpar performance and limited features overall.
The Vivo Y29 5G's underwhelming performance is the most significant disappointment with this device overall.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
ZTE Axon 60
2 GHz
vivo Y29 5G
2.40 GHz

RAM

Winner
ZTE Axon 60
6GB
vivo Y29 5G
4GB

Storage

Winner
ZTE Axon 60
256GB
vivo Y29 5G
128GB

Weight

Winner
ZTE Axon 60
182g
vivo Y29 5G
198g
Rank
ZTE Axon 60
#734
vivo Y29 5G
Winner
#638
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
ZTE Axon 60
#813
vivo Y29 5G
#607
Winner
Design
ZTE Axon 60
#740
vivo Y29 5G
#736
Winner
Display
ZTE Axon 60
#747
vivo Y29 5G
#615
Winner
Performance
ZTE Axon 60
#610
Winner
vivo Y29 5G
#650
Battery
ZTE Axon 60
#725
vivo Y29 5G
#408
Winner
Camera
ZTE Axon 60
#679
Winner
vivo Y29 5G
#758

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
ZTE ZTE Axon 60
vivo vivo Y29 5G
Model
Unisoc Tiger T616
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
CPU
2 x ARM Cortex, A75 2.0Ghz + 6 x ARM Cortex, A55 1.8Ghz
2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex, A76 +6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex, A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12
6
Frequency
2
2.40
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Mali-G57 MP1
Arm Mali-G57 MC2
RAM
6
4
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
256
128
Type
UFS Storage 2.2
eMMC 5.1 Storage
SD slot
No
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
N/A
Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers
Antutu Score
285000
420000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 62% of devices
Overall performance better than 71% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

ZTE Axon 60

Strengths

The performance has not disappointed me and on the contrary has far exceeded the expectations I had considering the processor that this device integrates.
It has enough power to export videos in full HD although obviously not with the maximum speed.
It is not so bad in terms of Graphics compatibility but obviously you cannot use a lot of effects due to the limited processor.
The Experience doesn't feel stable fortunately there was not a moment where it came to stay completely Frozen.
It is advisable to select low graphic qualities and in this case the device behaved very well had very good stability 60 frames per second on average.
The heating is going to be really very low compared to the heating that we would find on other devices.
You have a lot of capacity to store there many photographs many videos and more and you also have the possibility of placing a micro SD card with what you could still save many more things.
It has enough power for gaming although it's not recommended due to the limited processor.

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

vivo Y29 5G

Strengths

The phone has a 6.68 inch IPS LCD display with HD Plus resolution, which is good for normal usage and outdoor visibility.
It has a 120Hz refresh rate, which provides smoothness in user experience.
The device comes with a dual speaker setup, making it suitable for entertainment purposes.
The phone has a fast charging speed of 44W, which is convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.

Weaknesses

The processor is not powerful enough (Qualcomm Snapdragon 632), leading to lagging performance in UI and heavy tasks.
The camera quality is disappointing, with a 50MP sensor on the back that produces average photos.
The phone does not support HDR or 4K content playback, which may be a drawback for some users.
The device has outdated features such as Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.4, and no NFC, which are important considerations in today's smartphones.
Read Full Reviews

ZTE Axon 60

The ZTE Axon 60 promises a decent smartphone experience without breaking the bank. With its unassuming processor, modest specs, and relatively affordable price tag, this device seems to be an entry-level offering from ZTE. However, its performance and capabilities may exceed expectations, particularly when it comes to running multiple apps simultaneously. As we dive into this review, let's see if the Axon 60 can deliver on its promise of a reliable and feature-rich smartphone experience at a budget-friendly price point.

vivo Y29 5G

I recently got my hands on the Vivo Y29 5G, a smartphone that promises a lot but delivers little. With a starting price of around Rs 15,000, I expected more from this device. The phone's design is decent, with a diamond-black finish and a sleek aluminum frame, but things take a turn for the worse when it comes to performance. The processor feels slow, even for basic tasks like browsing and social media, and the camera is underwhelming, producing average photos that don't impress.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features