ZTE Blade A56vsSamsung Galaxy A04
We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
ZTE Blade A56
#1022
Winner
+3
Processor:Unisoc T7200
RAM:4 GBGB
Storage:64 GBGB
Quick Stats
The ZTE Blade A56's 5000 mAh battery ensures all-day endurance, though 10W charging is relatively slow.
The ZTE Blade A56's 90Hz display ensures smooth performance for casual tasks with HD+ resolution.
The ZTE Blade A56's cameras offer basic functionality, lacking advanced features for casual photography needs.
Mid-range processor and 4GB RAM handle daily tasks smoothly but struggle with heavy multitasking or gaming.
Samsung Galaxy A04
#1024
+6
Processor:MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765
RAM:4 GBGB
Storage:32 GBGB
Quick Stats
The Samsung Galaxy A04's 5000mAh battery offers 1-2 days of use, prioritizing endurance over fast charging.
The Samsung Galaxy A04's 6.5-inch IPS LCD display offers vibrant colors and an 81% screen-to-body ratio for immersive viewing.
The Galaxy A04's dual-lens camera offers basic portrait mode but lacks advanced features.
The Samsung Galaxy A04's entry-level performance handles basic tasks but struggles with heavy multitasking or high-end apps.
Specifications Comparison
Specification
ZTE ZTE Blade A56
Samsung Samsung Galaxy A04
Model
Unisoc T7200
MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765
CPU
2x1.6 GHz Cortex, A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex, A55
4x Cortex, A53 2.3 GHz + 4x Cortex, A53 1.8 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12 nm
14 nm
Frequency
1,6 GHz
2,3 GHz
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
ARM Mali-G57
PowerVR GE8320
RAM
4 GB
4 GB
Capacity
64 GB
32 GB
Type
eMMC 5.1 Storage
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
No
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
No
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Audio
DTS / DTS X, Stereo Speakers
N/A
Antutu Score
240000
124000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v9
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 58% of devices
Overall performance better than 52% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
Rankings
Connectivity
ZTE Blade A56
#934
Winner
Samsung Galaxy A04
#962
Design
ZTE Blade A56
#937
Winner
Samsung Galaxy A04
#1047
Display
ZTE Blade A56
#884
Winner
Samsung Galaxy A04
#983
Performance
ZTE Blade A56
#998
Samsung Galaxy A04
#976
Winner
Battery
ZTE Blade A56
#1009
Winner
Samsung Galaxy A04
#1030
Camera
ZTE Blade A56
#1056
Samsung Galaxy A04
#922
Winner
| Metric | ZTE Blade A56 | Samsung Galaxy A04 |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity | #934 Winner | #962 |
| Design | #937 Winner | #1047 |
| Display | #884 Winner | #983 |
| Performance | #998 | #976 Winner |
| Battery | #1009 Winner | #1030 |
| Camera | #1056 | #922 Winner |
Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.
Key Differences
No significant specification differences found between these devices.
Scores by Category
Pros and Cons
ZTE Blade A56
Strengths
Long-lasting 5000 mAh battery for extended use.
Smooth 90Hz display for responsive everyday tasks.
Dual SIM support with practical multitasking capabilities.
Latest Android 15 OS ensures modern software experience.
Weaknesses
HD+ resolution display may lack sharpness for detail-oriented users.
Mid-range processor and 4GB RAM limit heavy multitasking and gaming.
Basic camera setup with no advanced imaging features.
10W charging speed is slower compared to modern standards.
Plastic build materials may feel less premium than metal/glass alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A04
Strengths
Large 5000mAh battery ensures 1–2 days of moderate use.
6.5-inch IPS LCD display with 81% screen-to-body ratio and vibrant colors.
Lightweight plastic body with ergonomic design and multiple color options.
Affordable price with reliable performance for basic tasks and media.
Dual SIM support and 3.5mm audio jack for connectivity flexibility.
Decent 50MP rear camera with dual-lens setup for everyday photography.
Weaknesses
720p resolution and 14 nm processor limit performance and display sharpness.
Plastic build and glossy finish attract fingerprints and smudges.
Lacks 5G, NFC, and advanced camera features like optical stabilization.
Entry-level MediaTek Helio P35 struggles with heavy multitasking.
No fast charging support, requiring longer charging sessions.
Read Full Reviews
ZTE Blade A56
Affordable smartphone with smooth 90Hz display, long-lasting battery, and Android 15. Ideal for daily tasks and casual use.
Samsung Galaxy A04
Experience the Samsung Galaxy A04: a budget-friendly smartphone with an immersive display, all-day battery life, and reliable performance for everyday essentials.
Need help choosing?
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Compare other phones
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Compare phones
VS
VS
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features