ZTE Blade A73 5GvsZTE Blade A75

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

ZTE
ZTE Blade A73 5G
Blade A73 5G
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T760
RAM:4GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Blade A73 5G offers impressive battery life, lasting up to two days with moderate use.
The ZTE Blade A73 5G's stunning display with 90Hz refresh rate is its standout feature overall.
The ZTE Blade A73 5G's camera is decent but struggles with low-light photography.
The ZTE Blade A73 5G's performance is adequate for everyday tasks but limited for demanding activities like gaming.
ZTE
ZTE Blade A75
Blade A75
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T606
RAM:4GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Blade A75's battery life is decent for mid-range smartphones, lasting a full day with moderate use.
The display's 120Hz refresh rate and decent color reproduction serve daily needs, despite noticeable limitations.
The ZTE Blade A75's camera performance is marred by lack of refinement and poor low-light capabilities mainly.
The ZTE Blade A75's mediocre performance, particularly in gaming, is a significant drawback of this affordable 5G smartphone.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
ZTE Blade A73 5G
2.20 GHz
ZTE Blade A75
1.60 GHz

RAM

Tie
ZTE Blade A73 5G
4GB
ZTE Blade A75
4GB

Storage

Winner
ZTE Blade A73 5G
128GB
ZTE Blade A75
256GB

Weight

Winner
ZTE Blade A73 5G
200g
ZTE Blade A75
189g
Rank
ZTE Blade A73 5G
Winner
#754
ZTE Blade A75
#780
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#609
Winner
ZTE Blade A75
#812
Design
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#745
ZTE Blade A75
#739
Winner
Display
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#701
ZTE Blade A75
#698
Winner
Performance
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#669
Winner
ZTE Blade A75
#802
Battery
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#681
Winner
ZTE Blade A75
#724
Camera
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#860
ZTE Blade A75
#800
Winner
item_phones_categoryId
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#–
ZTE Blade A75
#1

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
ZTE ZTE Blade A73 5G
ZTE ZTE Blade A75
Model
Unisoc Tiger T760
Unisoc Tiger T606
CPU
4x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex, A76 +4x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex, A55
2x1.6 GHz Cortex, A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex, A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
6
12
Frequency
2.20
1.60
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
ARM Mali-G57 MP4
ARM Mali-G57
RAM
4
4
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
N/A
Capacity
128
256
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
N/A
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Audio
N/A
DTS / DTS X
Antutu Score
390176
240000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 68% of devices
Overall performance better than 58% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

ZTE Blade A73 5G

Strengths

The phone is priced reasonably at Ringgit Malaysia 749, making it an affordable option.
It features 5G Network, which is a significant selling point given its price point.
The phone has a large 6.52 HD Plus display running at a 90 Hertz refresh rate.
The 5000 milliamp hour battery provides decent battery life for its price.
The phone's performance is reasonable, making it suitable for casual gaming and general use.
The adaptive 5G feature allows users to prioritize certain applications for 5G data usage.

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

ZTE Blade A75

Strengths

The phone's camera module is sizable and one of its most striking features.
The phone produces vivid colors making for a decent viewing experience.
The face unlock feature works fairly quickly to respond.
The phone excels in color reproduction in well-lit environments.
The phone comes with a transparent rubber case out of the box to address smudges.
The phone has a mono loud speaker, although it's not the best quality.
The phone supports 5G connectivity and has a dual nano SIM card slot.
The phone can last an entire day with usual activities.

Weaknesses

The phone heats up just minutes into running a game.
The phone is not compatible with Zenfone Zero, which means users can't play relatively new games on it.
The phone's speaker works poorly and feels muffled when taking calls.
The phone's charging speed is slow, taking almost 3 hours to charge from 20% to full.
The phone isn't ideal for gaming sessions, lasting only about four to five games.
The phone can get too hot to touch during prolonged gaming sessions.
The phone's camera performance is not mentioned as being particularly impressive.
The phone's design is limited to a single colorway of Diamond Black.
Read Full Reviews

ZTE Blade A73 5G

The ZTE Blade A73 5G is an affordable smartphone that boasts impressive features for its price point. Priced at RM749 in Malaysia, this device offers a balance between affordability and performance. With a 6.52-inch HD+ display, 5000mAh battery, and 128GB internal storage, it's a solid option for those on a budget. The phone also supports 5G connectivity, making it an attractive choice for those who want to future-proof their devices without breaking the bank. Let's dive deeper into its features and see how it stacks up against other options in this segment.

ZTE Blade A75

In today's smartphone landscape, 5G connectivity is becoming increasingly essential. While many devices boast basic Wi-Fi and Bluetooth capabilities, 5G technology offers unparalleled speeds and reliability. However, it often comes at a premium price point. The ZTE Blade A75, on the other hand, is one of the most affordable 5G smartphones available. Priced around PHP 5,450, this device promises to deliver decent performance without breaking the bank. Does it live up to its promise?

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Read ZTE Blade A73 5G ReviewRead ZTE Blade A75 Review

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features