ZTE Blade V60vsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

ZTE
ZTE Blade V60
Blade V60
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T606
RAM:4GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Blade V60's decent but not outstanding battery life is a solid compromise between power and price.
The ZTE Blade V60's display offers a smooth viewing experience with decent color reproduction and brightness levels.
The ZTE Blade V60's camera delivers decent performance, but struggles with low-light and AI-powered features.
The ZTE Blade V60 delivers decent performance considering its budget-friendly price point and mid-range specs.
Xiaomi
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
Processor:MediaTek Helio G100
RAM:8GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G's battery life is decent, but not exceptional, lasting around a full day reliably.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G's display offers a smooth 120Hz experience with improved brightness and stereo speakers added.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G's cameras are serviceable, but don't live up to expectations despite being adequate for everyday use.
The Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G's performance is average, with gaming capabilities and camera quality being its primary limitations.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
ZTE Blade V60
1.60 GHz
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
2.20 GHz

RAM

Winner
ZTE Blade V60
4GB
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
8GB

Storage

Winner
ZTE Blade V60
128GB
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
256GB

Weight

Winner
ZTE Blade V60
198g
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
180g
Rank
ZTE Blade V60
#743
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
Winner
#208
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
ZTE Blade V60
#811
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
#559
Winner
Design
ZTE Blade V60
#737
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
#399
Winner
Display
ZTE Blade V60
#697
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
#232
Winner
Performance
ZTE Blade V60
#801
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
#483
Winner
Battery
ZTE Blade V60
#723
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
#410
Winner
Camera
ZTE Blade V60
#665
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
#25
Winner
item_phones_categoryId
ZTE Blade V60
#
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
#1

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
ZTE ZTE Blade V60
Xiaomi Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G
Model
Unisoc Tiger T606
MediaTek Helio G100
CPU
2x1.6 GHz Cortex, A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex, A55
2x2.2GHz Cortex, A76 + 6x2.6GHz Cortex, A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12
6
Frequency
1.60
2.20
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
ARM Mali-G57
Arm Mali-G57 MC2
RAM
4
8
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128
256
Type
N/A
UFS Storage 2.2
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, in screen
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
N/A
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor
N/A
Yes
Audio
DTS / DTS X
Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers
Antutu Score
240000
420000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 58% of devices
Overall performance better than 71% of devices
Cooling system
No
Yes
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

ZTE Blade V60

Strengths

The device comes with a good quality charger for its price
The battery has a capacity of 5,000 Mah hours which supports 22.5 WS charging
It's capable of recording full HD video, which is remarkable in budget devices
The front and rear cameras are able to record in this resolution
It comes with Android 13, although it doesn't come with the latest update (Android 14)
The device has a simple but interesting design that gives some visual texture

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G

Strengths

A value-packed Xiaomi mid-ranger that covers all the basics quite well
Expandable storage up to 1TB, which is not easy to find nowadays
A headphone jack, which many phones no longer have
A large 5500mAh battery with a good endurance rating of 12 hours and 7 minutes
Support for 45W charging, which can charge the phone from 0 to 42% in half an hour
Decent overall performance from the Mediatek Helio G100 Ultra chipset
A reliable under-display optical fingerprint reader

Weaknesses

A lower IP64 rating against splashes of water compared to the 5G model's IP68 rating
A less sharp display with a lower 1080p resolution and no support for HDR video content or 12bit color
No thermal management issues, but gaming performance is a bit of a struggle
Limited to 1080p video capture due to the Helio G100 chipset
The ultra-wide camera has average detail and poor contrast at night
Close-up shots from the macro camera have plenty of noise and softness
The selfie camera produces photos with okay detail but facial features look a bit soft
Read Full Reviews

ZTE Blade V60

The ZTE Blade V60 is a budget-friendly smartphone that packs a punch in its price range. With a launch price of 2,499 pesos in Mexico, this device offers impressive specs for the money. The phone features a 6.6-inch HD+ screen with a 90Hz refresh rate, a 50-megapixel primary camera, and a large 5,000mAh battery. Powered by an Unisoc T66 processor, this smartphone promises to deliver smooth performance without breaking the bank.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 4G is a value-packed mid-ranger that offers a lot more than its 5G counterpart. With a larger battery, different screen and chipset, and expandable storage, this phone seems to cover all the basics quite well. However, it also has some notable differences and compromises compared to the 5G model, such as a lower IP rating and less sharp display. Is this the one to get for those on a budget? Our review will delve into its strengths and weaknesses.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features