Xiaomi Redmi K40vsHonor Magic7 Lite

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Xiaomi
Xiaomi Redmi K40
Redmi K40
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (SM8250-AC)
RAM:6GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Xiaomi Redmi K40 boasts impressive battery life, lasting a full day and night effortlessly.
The Xiaomi Redmi K40's E4 AMOLED screen delivers an excellent visual experience with vibrant colors and deep blacks.
The Xiaomi Redmi K40's camera has notable improvements, especially in night mode and macro photography capabilities overall.
The Xiaomi Redmi K40's performance is satisfactory but not exceptional, lacking significant improvement over its predecessors overall.
Honor
Honor Magic7 Lite
Magic7 Lite
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen1
RAM:8GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The Honor Magic7 Lite's impressive battery life is its standout feature, lasting over 12 hours on a single charge.
The Honor Magic7 Lite's display offers a crisp and clear viewing experience with automatic brightness adjustment and 90Hz refresh rate.
The Honor Magic7 Lite's camera stands out with impressive image quality, advanced features, and creative capabilities at a mid-range price.
The Honor Magic7 Lite delivers smooth and seamless performance with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 processor.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Xiaomi Redmi K40
3.20 GHz
Honor Magic7 Lite
2.20 GHz

RAM

Winner
Xiaomi Redmi K40
6GB
Honor Magic7 Lite
8GB

Storage

Winner
Xiaomi Redmi K40
128GB
Honor Magic7 Lite
256GB

Weight

Winner
Xiaomi Redmi K40
196g
Honor Magic7 Lite
189g
Rank
Xiaomi Redmi K40
Winner
#318
Honor Magic7 Lite
#375
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Xiaomi Redmi K40
#293
Winner
Honor Magic7 Lite
#452
Design
Xiaomi Redmi K40
#496
Winner
Honor Magic7 Lite
#509
Display
Xiaomi Redmi K40
#209
Honor Magic7 Lite
#73
Winner
Performance
Xiaomi Redmi K40
#246
Winner
Honor Magic7 Lite
#468
Battery
Xiaomi Redmi K40
#521
Honor Magic7 Lite
#172
Winner
Camera
Xiaomi Redmi K40
#336
Winner
Honor Magic7 Lite
#338
item_phones_categoryId
Xiaomi Redmi K40
#1
Tie
Honor Magic7 Lite
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Xiaomi Xiaomi Redmi K40
Honor Honor Magic7 Lite
Model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (SM8250-AC)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen1
CPU
1x Cortex, A77 3.20 GHz + 3x Cortex, A77 2.4 GHz + 4x Cortex, A55 1.8 GHz
4x2.2GHz Cortex A78 + 4x1.80GHz Cortex A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
7
4
Frequency
3.20
2.20
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 650
Adreno 710
RAM
6
8
Type
RAM LPDDR5
N/A
Capacity
128
256
Type
UFS Storage 3.1
N/A
SD slot
No
No
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, in screen
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
N/A
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Gravity sensor
N/A
Yes
Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor
Yes
Yes
Audio
Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers
Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones
Antutu Score
802870
575000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 83% of devices
Overall performance better than 76% of devices
Cooling system
Yes
Yes
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
X-axis linear motors
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Xiaomi Redmi K40

Strengths

No specific pros listed for this device

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Honor Magic7 Lite

Strengths

No specific pros listed for this device

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Read Full Reviews

Xiaomi Redmi K40

The Xiaomi Redmi K40 boasts an impressive design, refined compared to its predecessor, with a sleek gradient color scheme that catches the eye. Weighing 196 grams and measuring 7.8mm in thickness, it's an excellent package for its price. The phone features a flat E4 OLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate, peak brightness of 1300 nits, and a 5:1 contrast ratio, resulting in outstanding performance and reduced power consumption. Under the hood lies the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 chip, which provides robust performance and is well-balanced. In benchmark tests, the K40 achieves scores of 662211, 4092, and 1034/3485 in Antutu, 3DMark, and Geekbench 5 respectively, comparable to its predecessor. Camera-wise, the K40's main camera utilizes a 1/2" IMX 582 sensor without optical stabilization. In daylight conditions, it underexposes samples with poor dynamic range, but nighttime performance is more impressive, with better exposure control and reduced noise. Battery life is satisfactory, lasting over 6 hours on our test, and the phone charges to 69% in half an hour using a 33W charger, which can fully charge the battery in 54 minutes. Overall, the K40 offers great value for its price segment, excelling in performance, low heating, and excellent screen quality. In conclusion, if you're seeking a high-performance smartphone with a sophisticated design and reasonable camera capabilities, the Xiaomi Redmi K40 is an attractive choice. It's not without its flaws but provides a comfortable experience in its price range, especially considering the recent influx of new phones that may stiffen competition in coming months.

Honor Magic7 Lite

The Honor Magic7 Lite promises to deliver a robust and feature-rich mid-range experience. This phone boasts a massive battery life, making it an ideal choice for those who need a device that can keep up with their daily demands. With a 5-star SGS certification, the Magic7 Lite's durability is put to the test - can you scratch its back and front sides with your keys or coins? Drop it from 2 meters high? Take it down to -30°C or heat it up to +50°C? This phone has been designed to withstand the toughest conditions. In this review, we'll dive into the Magic7 Lite's capabilities and see if it lives up to its promises.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features